I think that I would be both correct and inoffensive to say
that David Shrigley has been very lucky. He’s lucky to have been nominated for
the Turner prize, and to have been on the fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square. He’s
lucky to have found work as an artist, something notoriously difficult to do. The
fact that he got a 2.2 for his degree in Environmental Art, which, apparently,
you get “just for turning up” makes it all the more impressive. He’s also lucky
to live in the UK, the only place, probably, to understand and appreciate his
understated, quiet but excellent sense of humour.
At the same time, it doesn’t take much to see that he is,
clearly, a brilliant artist. Perhaps not in the traditional sense: he debates
the usefulness of being able to draw well, and has a strange, cartoonish,
childish style. He seems to dislike people analysing his art- more than once, I
am reminded of an interview I saw with Freddie Mercury where he stated he hadn’t
a clue what Bohemian Rhapsody was about.
You do truly get a feeling of an artist when Shrigley talks.
He seems uncertain in himself, sometimes mentioning his fame, other times painting
himself as shy, uncharismatic and awkward. There’s a sense, too, that he must
be able to sell his work quite well, both to galleries and to strangers in the
pub (he tells us that this is how he started off, with self-published books of
cartoons for the price of a couple of beers).
He seems uncertain, too, about the Turner prize (he was
nominated, but did not win, in 2013). It appears to him as though everyone is
nominated- like turning 30, or finding your first grey hair, Turner prize
nominations are inevitable. He tells us of the people living in a mile radius
of him who have been nominated or won it. The figure is the double digits. I have
never been to Glasgow, but I am left with the distinct feeling that they keep
all the artists penned up together, although I couldn’t offer a reason why. Inspiration,
possibly? Proximity to galleries?
For someone to whom the Turner Prize is no big deal, Shrigley
certainly talks about it for a while. His final piece was a statue of a man who
pisses into a bucket (which instantly makes me wonder how exactly this works,
and more disturbingly, if they’re using real wee) surrounded by drawings of
this statue, done by members of the public. He recalls the art gallery asking
if they could sell them. He was against it, apparently “everyone can come and
take theirs home, if they want it”. Personally, I like the idea of someone
framing and displaying a kid’s picture of a misshapen man, pissing, and hanging
it over their fireplace to admire with some red wine. But perhaps I have a
twisted sense of humour.
Looking through his artwork on google, you get the sense
that it’s almost Warhol-like in its ability to be replicated, multiple times,
quickly. Later, someone asks if he minds people getting tattoos of his work, or
putting it on tea towels and shirts. Not at all, apparently. He thinks some of
the shirts are “a bit shit”, but his reluctance to tell the Japanese company
who are making them means that they are still going ahead. I wonder if it’s
because he can’t speak Japanese. To be honest, if I saw one of his shirts on
sale in Camden Market, I’d probably buy it.
Another question comes in. what does he dislike in other
people’s paintings? He dislikes, apparently, work that is immediately
understandable. Going back to my Google search and remembering what was on the
projector behind him, I can see that a lot of what he does works on different
levels. One, a picture of six cans of cola with “I drank six cans of cola one after
the other and now I feel fucking great” could be a comment on societies reliance
on drugs. Or the intensive consumerism of western culture. Or what to do when
very, very bored on a Sunday afternoon. I've had worse ideas.
There’s plenty that Shrigley doesn't talk about. According to
Wikipedia, he directed a video for Blur and does cartoons for the Guardian. But
I find this out later, because I didn’t know who I was going to see. Instead,
stupidly, I had just written down a time and a place. But listening to Shrigley
speak, I don’t think he would mind.
Clara Godwin-Suttie
Clara Godwin-Suttie
No comments:
Post a Comment